Seattle Commons — The Case For

Why this is a win for Hotels Adjacent to Summit (Hyatt cluster)

commercial
The Win

Convention attendees fill your rooms at premium rates — you're the direct revenue beneficiary of the Summit's event calendar. A more active Arch doesn't threaten that. It adds a different kind of visitor: cultural tourists, regional day-trippers, people extending a stay to see programming. Different customer profile, same rooms filled. A more vibrant corridor also justifies the premium positioning your rates depend on.

Ask Your AI

Copy this prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, or any AI assistant.

I want to analyze this proposal from the perspective of Hotels Adjacent to Summit (Hyatt cluster). There's a civic proposal to convert the WSCC Arch building at 7th & Pike into a year-round public commons operated by Seattle Center. The case being made to Hotels Adjacent to Summit (Hyatt cluster): Convention attendees fill your rooms at premium rates — you're the direct revenue beneficiary of the Summit's event calendar. A more active Arch doesn't threaten that. It adds a different kind of visitor: cultural tourists, regional day-trippers, people extending a stay to see programming. Different customer profile, same rooms filled. A more vibrant corridor also justifies the premium positioning your rates depend on. The full proposal: https://commons.conventioncityseattle.com What are the strongest arguments for and against, from Hotels Adjacent to Summit (Hyatt cluster)'s perspective?
Read the evidence
What programming the commons would host →